The Case against EducationWhy the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money
|
Diese Seite wurde seit 1 Jahr inhaltlich nicht mehr aktualisiert.
Unter Umständen ist sie nicht mehr aktuell.
Zusammenfassungen
Despite being immensely popular--and immensely lucrative―education is grossly overrated. In this explosive book, Bryan Caplan argues that the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skill but to certify their intelligence, work ethic, and conformity―in other words, to signal the qualities of a good employee. Learn why students hunt for easy As and casually forget most of what they learn after the final exam, why decades of growing access to education have not resulted in better jobs for the average worker but instead in runaway credential inflation, how employers reward workers for costly schooling they rarely if ever use, and why cutting education spending is the best remedy.
Caplan draws on the latest social science to show how the labor market values grades over knowledge, and why the more education your rivals have, the more you need to impress employers. He explains why graduation is our society's top conformity signal, and why even the most useless degrees can certify employability. He advocates two major policy responses. The first is educational austerity. Government needs to sharply cut education funding to curb this wasteful rat race. The second is more vocational education, because practical skills are more socially valuable than teaching students how to outshine their peers.
Romantic notions about education being "good for the soul" must yield to careful research and common sense―The Case against Education points the way.
Von Klappentext im Buch The Case against Education (2018) Caplan draws on the latest social science to show how the labor market values grades over knowledge, and why the more education your rivals have, the more you need to impress employers. He explains why graduation is our society's top conformity signal, and why even the most useless degrees can certify employability. He advocates two major policy responses. The first is educational austerity. Government needs to sharply cut education funding to curb this wasteful rat race. The second is more vocational education, because practical skills are more socially valuable than teaching students how to outshine their peers.
Romantic notions about education being "good for the soul" must yield to careful research and common sense―The Case against Education points the way.
Dieses Buch erwähnt ...
Personen KB IB clear | Amy Chua | ||||||||||||||||||
Begriffe KB IB clear | Bildungeducation (Bildung) , Flynn-Effekt , Gesellschaftsociety , Schuleschool , Soziale Erwünschtheit | ||||||||||||||||||
Bücher |
|
Dieses Buch erwähnt vermutlich nicht ...
Nicht erwähnte Begriffe | Digitalisierung, Kinder, LehrerIn, Lernen, Schweiz, Unterricht |
Tagcloud
Zitationsgraph
Zitationsgraph (Beta-Test mit vis.js)
5 Erwähnungen
- The Fourth Education Revolution (Anthony Seldon, Oladimeji Abidoye) (2018)
- Seminar 3/2019 (2019)
- Should Robots Replace Teachers? - AI and the Future of Education (Neil Selwyn) (2019)
- The Fourth Education Revolution Reconsidered - Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate Or Infantilise Humanity (Anthony Seldon, Oladimeji Abidoye, Timothy Metcalf) (2020)
- The Future of AI in Education - 13 Things We Can Do to Minimize the Damage (Arran Hamilton, Dylan Wiliam, John Hattie) (2023)
Co-zitierte Bücher
Bowling alone
(Robert Putnam) (2000)Artificial Intelligence In Education
Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning
(Wayne Holmes, Maya Bialik, Charles Fadel) (2019)Volltext dieses Dokuments
Bibliographisches
Beat und dieses Buch
Beat hat dieses Buch während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. (das er aber aus Urheberrechtsgründen nicht einfach weitergeben darf). Aufgrund der wenigen Einträge im Biblionetz scheint er es nicht wirklich gelesen zu haben. Es gibt bisher auch nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.