Judgment under uncertaintyHeuristics and biases
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman
Erstpublikation in: Science, 1974, 185, 1124-1131
Publikationsdatum:
Zu finden in: Judgment under Uncertainty, 1982
|
|
Zusammenfassungen
This article described three heuristics that are employed in making
judgments under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually
employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or
event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or
scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the
frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and
(iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical
prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly
economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable
errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to
which they lead could improve judgments and decisions in situations of
uncertainty.
Von Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman im Text Judgment under uncertainty (1974) Dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel erwähnt ...
Zitationsgraph
Zitationsgraph (Beta-Test mit vis.js)
Zeitleiste
25 Erwähnungen
- The Innovator's Dilemma - When new technologies cause great firms to fail (Clayton Christensen) (1997)
- Philosophy in the Flesh - the Embodied Mind & its Challenge to Western Thought (G. Lakoff, Mark Johnson) (1999)
- Alles Zufall (Stefan Klein) (2004)
- Causal Learning - Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation (Alison Gopnik, Laura Schulz) (2007)
- Nudge - Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein) (2008)
- Author Cocitation Analysis - Quantitative Methods for Mapping the Intellectual Structure of an Academic Discipline (Sean B. Eom) (2008)
- The Changing Structure of Decision Support Systems Research - An Empirical Investigation through Author Cocitation Mapping (1990-1999)
- Worst-Case Scenarios (Cass R. Sunstein) (2009)
- CSCL 2009 (2009)
- Knowledge Exchange as a Motivational Problem - Results of an Empirical Research Program (Ulrike Creß, Joachim Kimmerle)
- Analyzing Interactions in CSCL - Methods, Approaches and Issues (Sadhana Puntambekar, Gijsbert Erkens, Cindy Hmelo-Silver) (2010)
- 6. Thinking about Methods to Capture Effective Collaborations (Stephanie D. Teasley)
- Schnelles Denken - langsames Denken (Daniel Kahneman) (2011)
- Respecting Truth (Lee McIntyre) (2015)
- Reclaiming Conversation - The Power of Talk in a Digital Age (Sherry Turkle) (2015)
- The Future of the Professions - How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts (Richard Susskind, Daniel Susskind) (2016)
- The ABCs of How We Learn - 26 Scientifically Proven Approaches, How They Work, and When to Use Them (2016)
- What Every Teacher Needs to Know About Psychology (David Didau, Nick Rose) (2016)
- Digitale Öffentlichkeit - Wie algorithmische Prozesse den gesellschaftlichen Diskurs beeinflussen (Konrad Lischka, Christian Stöcker) (2017)
- Reinventing Capitalism in the Age of Big Data (Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Thomas Ramge) (2018)
- Post-Truth (Lee McIntyre) (2018)
- (Un)berechenbar? - Algorithmen und Automatisierung in Staat und Gesellschaft (Resa Mohabbat Kar, Basanta Thapa, Peter Parycek) (2018)
- The Cost-Benefit Revolution (Cass R. Sunstein) (2018)
- Die Zukunft der Datenökonomie - Zwischen Geschäftsmodell, Kollektivgut und Verbraucherschutz (Carsten Ochs, Michael Friedewald, Thomas Hess, Jörn Lamla) (2019)
- 15. Jenseits der puren Datenökonomie - Social-Media-Plattformen besser designen (Thilo Hagendorff)
- How Change Happens (Cass R. Sunstein) (2019)
- Too Much Information - Understanding What You Dont Want to Know (Cass R. Sunstein) (2020)
- The Atlas of AI (Kate Crawford) (2021)
- The Singularity is nearer (Ray Kurzweil) (2024)
- 4. Life is getting exponentially better
Volltext dieses Dokuments
Judgment under uncertainty: Artikel als Volltext (: , 1058 kByte; : ) |
Anderswo suchen
Beat und dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel
Beat hat Dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. Eine digitale Version ist auf dem Internet verfügbar (s.o.). Aufgrund der wenigen Einträge im Biblionetz scheint er es nicht wirklich gelesen zu haben.