/ en / Traditional / mobile

Beats Biblionetz - Texte

For me, programming is ..

Beth Simon, Brian Hanks, Renée McCauley, Briana B. Morrison, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander
Zu finden in: ICER 2009 (Seite 105 bis 116), 2009
Erste Seite des Textes (PDF-Thumbnail)


Fun, interesting, hard, rewarding, and challenging: these are the most frequent responses of 697 students from five institutions at the end of a first programming course. Student experience with introductory programming courses is of interest to the computing education community, especially due to continued decreases in enrollments in computing degree programs. In this study, we explore one direct approach to document students' initial attitudinal experiences with programming by asking them to complete an open-ended question at the end of a first programming course. Based on content-analysis of students' responses, we find that nearly 50% of responses were positive in nature, there is significant difference in the responses of majors and non-majors, and that response characteristics correlate to earned grade in the course. We present preliminary, but inconclusive evidence on the impact of context (e.g., gaming or media computation) in a first programming course. Finally, we propose a multiple-choice question based on the most common student responses for large-scale deployment in computing courses and identify key contextual information that will inform future analysis of that data.

Von Beth Simon, Brian Hanks, Renée McCauley, Briana B. Morrison, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Konferenz-Band ICER 2009 im Text For me, programming is .. (2009)
Nearly 700 students from five institutions enrolled in seven introductory programming courses provided more than twentyfive hundred responses to the “for me, programming is ...” question. Overall, 48% of all responses were positive, 32% were negative, and the rest could not be interpreted as either positive or negative. Similar ratios were observed in five of the courses. In the remaining two courses, positive responses made up only 37% and 42% of the total, while the negative response rates were 49% and 40%, respectively.
The most common response indicated that many students believe that programming is fun or cool. Many students also describe programming as interesting or rewarding. But, the students also indicate that they think that learning to program is difficult or frustrating.
As noted above, in two of the courses we observed lower positive response rates. These courses were taught using media computation or gaming-focused approaches, which might lead us to conclude that these approaches are not effective. However, one of the other courses was also taught using the media computation approach, and the positive response rate in this course did not differ from that seen in the courses that were taught using traditional approaches. These results suggest that in some situations students may not find contextualized approaches to teaching programming as compelling as we might have hoped.
We also found significant differences in the response distributions between majors and non-majors. Non-majors tended to provide fewer positive and more negative comments than majors. They were less likely to view programming as fun or cool, but more likely to see it as something that was useful or interesting. They were also more likely to view it as a miserable or pointless activity, even though they did not indicate that it was hard or difficult as frequently as majors did. The media computation approach course with lower positive response rates was also comprised solely of non-majors.
Based on these findings, we have proposed and piloted a multiple-choice question that can be used to assess students’ affective beliefs about programming. We hope that the wide-scale use of this question in computer science education research will lead to better evaluation of the impact of proposed pedagogical interventions on students’ attitudes and beliefs about programming.
Von Beth Simon, Brian Hanks, Renée McCauley, Briana B. Morrison, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Konferenz-Band ICER 2009 im Text For me, programming is .. (2009)

iconDieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt...

KB IB clear
Jens Bennedsen, Michael E. Caspersen, Allan Fisher, Maria Knobelsdorf, Kasper Dalgaard Larsen, Jane Margolis, Carsten Schulte

KB IB clear
Wie ist das Image der Informatik?

KB IB clear
Programmieren ist schwierig

KB IB clear
Bildungeducation (Bildung), Informatikcomputer science, Informatik-Unterricht (Fachinformatik)Computer Science Education, Lernenlearning, Programmierenprogramming
Jahr UmschlagTitelAbrufeIBOBKBLB
2002     Unlocking the Clubhouse (Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher) 7, 4, 1, 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 6, 9, 8, 54121591
2007ITiCSE 2007 (Janet Hughes, D. Ramanee Peiris, Paul T. Tymann) 5, 4, 4, 5, 2, 4, 16, 5, 4, 5, 4, 5192505469
2007ICER 2007 (Richard J. Anderson, Sally Fincher, Mark Guzdial) 1, 1, 6, 4, 6, 3, 12, 5, 8, 2, 6, 72334770
2008ICER 2008 (Michael E. Caspersen, Raymond Lister, Mike Clancy) 2, 1, 3, 4, 3, 3, 2, 7, 14, 3, 5, 82234865
Jahr UmschlagTitelAbrufeIBOBKBLB
2007Mental models and programming aptitude (Michael E. Caspersen, Kasper Dalgaard Larsen, Jens Bennedsen) 4200
2007    Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science (Carsten Schulte, Maria Knobelsdorf) 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 3, 6, 2, 8, 1, 2, 348337
2008    Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science? (Jens Bennedsen, Michael E. Caspersen) 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 122110

iconDieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt nicht... Eine statistisch erstelle Liste von nicht erwähnten (oder zumindest nicht erfassten) Begriffen, die aufgrund der erwähnten Begriffe eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit aufweisen, erwähnt zu werden.

Nicht erwähnte Begriffe


Diese Grafik fensterfüllend anzeigen als Pixelgrafik (PNG) Vektorgrafik (SVG)


Diese Grafik fensterfüllend anzeigen als Pixelgrafik (PNG) Vektorgrafik (SVG)

iconAnderswo finden


iconVolltext dieses Dokuments

LokalAuf dem WWW For me, programming is ..: Fulltext at the ACM Digital Library (lokal: PDF, 396 kByte; WWW: Link OK 2018-01-11)

iconAnderswo suchen Auch im Biblionetz finden Sie nicht alles. Aus diesem Grund bietet das Biblionetz bereits ausgefüllte Suchformulare für verschiedene Suchdienste an. Biblionetztreffer werden dabei ausgeschlossen.

iconBiblionetz-History Dies ist eine graphische Darstellung, wann wie viele Verweise von und zu diesem Objekt ins Biblionetz eingetragen wurden und wie oft die Seite abgerufen wurde.

Verweise auf dieses Konferenz-Paper 2
Verweise von diesem Konferenz-Paper 24
Webzugriffe auf dieses Konferenz-Paper 41123412214110333