The Impact of Ebooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People
A study of schools using RM Books
Irene Picton, Christina Clark
Publikationsdatum:
Diese Seite wurde seit 7 Jahren inhaltlich nicht mehr aktualisiert.
Unter Umständen ist sie nicht mehr aktuell.
Zusammenfassungen
Von Beat Döbeli Honegger, erfasst im Biblionetz am 01.11.2016
The study is one of the first and largest to explore the impact of ebooks on reading attitudes, behaviour and attainment in UK schools. Forty schools took part by using RM ebooks for their own literacy projects and a total of 468 pupils were surveyed before and after participating.
Von Klappentext im Text The Impact of Ebooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People (2015) This report outlines findings about the impact of access to an ebooks platform on pupils’ reading motivation and skills over the academic year 2014/15. Schools from across the UK provided attitudinal and attainment data before and after running an ebooks project with a group of pupils, and a selection of practitioners and pupils also took part in interviews and focus groups to allow us to explore initial findings in more depth. Key findings include:
Von Irene Picton, Christina Clark im Text The Impact of Ebooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People (2015) - The average reading progress made over the project period was 8 months. Boys made significantly greater progress over the course of the study than girls, with boys’ reading levels increasing by an average of 8.4 months compared with girls who made an average gain of 7.2 months.
- Pupils who used RM to read more, made more progress, with pupils in the high usage group making an average of 8.8 months’ progress over the course of the project compared with an average progress of -1.25 months in the low usage group.
- Enjoyment of reading increased significantly over the course of project activities, particularly with respect to enjoyment of reading using technology. 59.4% of pupils enjoyed reading either very much or quite a lot before the project began. This rose to 64.1% post-project. 68.1% of pupils enjoyed reading using technology in the pre-project survey; this increased to 74.3% post-project.
- More pupils thought reading was cool after the project. Fewer said that they found reading difficult or that they could not find things to read that interest them. There was a 27% increase in the number of pupils who thought that reading was cool over the course of the project, rising from 51.8% before the project to 65.9% after the project. The number of pupils who said that they cannot find things to read that interest them decreased by 37%, from 31.3% to 19.7%. The number who felt that reading was difficult halved over the course of the project, decreasing from 14.8% to 6.8%.
- Positive attitudinal changes were more pronounced for boys. There was an 11% increase in the number of boys who enjoyed reading using technology over the course of the project (60.9% pre, 67.9% post); a 25% increase in the number who read daily using technology (30.9% to 38.7%) and a 22% increase in the number who read for an hour or longer using technology. Twice as many boys felt that reading was cool at the end of the project (36.4% pre, 66.5% post) and the percentage that felt reading was difficult almost halved (28.0% pre, 15.9% post).
- Reading enjoyment increased in particular for boys who started the project with the lowest levels of reading enjoyment. The percentage of this subgroup who enjoyed reading using technology increased over the course of the project from 49.2% to 64.2%. However, the percentage that enjoyed reading on paper also increased fourfold, from 10.0% at the beginning of the project to 40.0% at the end of the project. Boys from this group also read for longer using technology, with the number reading for more than an hour tripling from 8.1% to 24.5%.
- Boys who did not enjoy reading at the start of the project also showed pronounced changes in reading attitudes. The percentage that felt reading was cool increased from 15.8% to 42.1%; conversely, the percentage who felt reading was difficult reduced from 36.8% to 10.5%.
- Fewer pupils eligible for free school meals felt that reading was difficult for them. The percentage that felt reading was difficult halved over the course of the project, decreasing from 26.7% pre-project to 12.6% post-project.
- Older pupils were less likely to say that they couldn’t find anything to read that interested them. The percentage of pupils in KS3 that couldn’t find things to read that interested them decreased by more than 10 percentage points, from 37.7% in pre-project surveys to 27.1% post-project.
- Of the pupils who used RM to read more, fewer said that they read only when they had to, or couldn’t find anything to read that interested them. The percentage of pupils in the ‘high usage’ category that said they read only when they had to decreased from 28.3% to 10.5%, while the percentage that said that they couldn’t find anything to read that interested them decreased from 37.4% to 17.5%.
- Most pupils preferred reading using technology, but a high proportion didn’t have a preference for the format they read on. Given a choice, nearly half (45.2%) of pupils at the end of the project said they preferred to read using technology, while just over a quarter (27.8 %) said they preferred reading on paper. 1 in 5 (21.2%) said they didn’t mind what they read on.
- 84.6% of practitioners felt that their ebooks project had increased pupils’ reading enjoyment and motivation, and 7 in 10 felt it had increased pupils’ reading skills.
Dieser Text erwähnt ...
Begriffe KB IB clear | Buchbook , Kinderchildren , Lesekompetenz , Motivationmotivation , Schuleschool |
Dieser Text erwähnt vermutlich nicht ...
Nicht erwähnte Begriffe | Bildung, Eltern, LehrerIn, Lernen, Schulbuch / Lehrmittel, Unterricht |
Tagcloud
Volltext dieses Dokuments
The Impact of Ebooks on the Reading Motivation and Reading Skills of Children and Young People: Artikel als Volltext ( : Link unterbrochen? Letzte Überprüfung: 2020-11-28 Letzte erfolgreiche Überprüfung: 2017-06-28) |
Anderswo suchen
Beat und dieser Text
Beat hat Dieser Text während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. Eine digitale Version ist auf dem Internet verfügbar (s.o.). Aufgrund der wenigen Einträge im Biblionetz scheint er es nicht wirklich gelesen zu haben. Es gibt bisher auch nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.