How the general public develops perceptions of computer scienceMaike Kaiser
Publikationsdatum:
|
|
Zusammenfassungen
What is computer science? That's the underlying question of our research on the perception of computer science among the general population as to what constitutes their concept of it. Two qualitative studies based on grounded theory [6] lead to the development of a model of different types of situations of contacts (SoC). SoC can be classified as perceived and non-perceived contact situations. If a situation is not consciously perceived, a person's concept of computer science remains unchanged. If a situation is consciously perceived, the concept may evolve. The results show that the perception of computer science can either be classified as a "tool" which facilitates an individual's professional and private workflow or as an "obstacle", which can arise either from the use of software or other digital tools, or externally through guidelines, technical progress or through purchases by third parties (e.g. children and their environment). The distinction between perceived and non-perceived situations of contact and between a tool and an obstacle relies on an individual complexity rating.
Dieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt ...
Personen KB IB clear | Ira Diethelm , Kultusministerkonferenz | ||||||||||||||||||
Fragen KB IB clear | Wie ist das Bild/Image der Informatik? | ||||||||||||||||||
Bücher |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Texte |
|
Zitationsgraph
Zitationsgraph (Beta-Test mit vis.js)
Anderswo finden
Volltext dieses Dokuments
How the general public develops perceptions of computer science: Fulltext at the ACM Digital Library (: , 385 kByte; : ) |
Anderswo suchen
Beat und dieses Konferenz-Paper
Beat hat Dieses Konferenz-Paper während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Er hat Dieses Konferenz-Paper einmalig erfasst und bisher nicht mehr bearbeitet. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. Eine digitale Version ist auf dem Internet verfügbar (s.o.). Aufgrund der wenigen Einträge im Biblionetz scheint er es nicht wirklich gelesen zu haben. Es gibt bisher auch nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.