Learning Management-Systeme schränken Kreativität ein | ![]() |

BiblioMap 
Comments
Bücher first.
By virtue of their intent and design, course management systems impose limitations on instructional creativity and approach. They aren't designed to encourage innovative teaching. As products marketed to institutions to help them integrate resources, they are designed along the lines of inventory control or commercial enterprise applications.
From Lisa M. Lane im Journal Educause Quarterly 2/2008 (2008) in the text Toolbox or Trap? With the emergence of new learning management systems and virtual learning environments based on alternative pedagogy, and the advent of Web 2.0 applications such as blogs, wikis, and social networking, one thing has become clear: the standardized nature of integrated commercial systems is limiting pedagogy. Although particularly an issue for novice users, it can even pose problems for experienced online instructors.
From Lisa M. Lane im Journal Educause Quarterly 2/2008 (2008) in the text Toolbox or Trap? Is, then, AI creative? From the perspective of generating novel and
unexpected output—and based on currently accepted conceptions and
assessment methods of creativity—this study must conclude that, yes, it
is. The impact of this fact will likely shape not only the practical applications
of AI’s simulated creativity in business and overall human life,
but how we understand the unique operation of human creativity as
well.
From Erik E. Guzik, Christian Byrge, Christian Gilde in the text The originality of machines (2023)
Citation Graph
2 References 
- Educause Quarterly 2/2008 (2008)
- Toolbox or Trap? - Course Management Systems and Pedagogy (Lisa M. Lane)
- Toolbox or Trap? - Course Management Systems and Pedagogy (Lisa M. Lane)
- The originality of machines - AI takes the Torrance Test (Erik E. Guzik, Christian Byrge, Christian Gilde) (2023)
Search at other places 
Biblionetz-History 
default1
default2
default2